BREAKING : Luke Musgrave Quietly Becoming Expendable for Packers Ahead of Trade Deadline

The NFL trade deadline is just under two weeks away on Nov 4. Currently, the Green Bay Packers sit at 4-1-1 and are not looking to be sellers; however, fans have been having conversations about potentially trading one of the many playmakers the team has. Trading one of them would open up more targets for some of the other members in the Packers’ receiving corps.

Following Sunday’s game, Packers fans threw out another potential trade candidate: third-year tight end Luke Musgrave (h/t @KenIngalls). Musgrave’s role with the Packers has seemingly diminished, and he could be a useful asset for a tight-end-hungry contender.

Luke Musgrave Could be Moved by the Trade Deadline

Musgrave was the first of two tight ends Green Bay drafted in the 2023 NFL draft. The 25-year-old was the 42nd pick, while Tucker Kraft was selected with the 78th overall pick. Upon both players being drafted, Packers fans had high hopes that they could become the NFL’s next dynamic tight end duo.

Unfortunately, the has not quite happened. Although Kraft is currently cementing himself as one of the league’s top tight ends, Musgrave is struggling. In 24 career games, the 25-year-old has recorded 46 receptions on 62 targets for 446 yards and one touchdown.

Musgrave’s best season came as a rookie; he caught 34 passes for 352 yards and one touchdown. It should be noted that he missed eight games last season due to an abdominal injury. Fans expected more out of him in his return this season, even with the crowded receiver room, but the returns just haven’t been there.

Musgrave has just five catches on six targets for 49 yards this season. Moreover, he has been a poor run blocker this year. In six games, he has recorded a 47.8 run blocking grade, according to Pro Football Focus. Musgrave’s poor performance as a run blocker has led to him being slowly replaced on running downs by John FitzPatrick, whose run block grade has increased in three consecutive games:

  • Week 3: 49.0
  • Week 4: 49.4
  • Week 5: 57.4
  • Week 7: 59.9

Given these factors, the Packers seeing what they can get for him is the most logical move. Green Bay could use some defensive tackle depth. Right now, they are without Devonte Wyatt and have struggled to get a push up the middle. Adding a DT who can provide pass rush will not only help while Wyatt is gone, but it will also provide much-needed depth in the playoffs.

While trading a recent second-round pick isn’t ideal, Musgrave’s diminished production and poor run blocking make him an expendable piece as the deadline approaches. If the right offer comes along, Green Bay may quietly move on from him sooner rather than later.

Related Posts

Intel from Matt LaFleur extension talks indicates one underwhelming outcome that raises questions for the Packers

The Green Bay Packers found a long-term extension with head coach Matt LaFleur, and that was likely a smart decision based on what the alternatives looked like. General…

BREAKING : Packers extending Matt LaFleur is right call, despite sour end to season

Can LaFleur lead the Packers to a Super Bowl after earning a contract extension from first-year team president Ed Policy?

T.J. Lang urges Matt LaFleur to make one genius coaching change

Former Green Bay Packers Pro Bowler T.J. Lang has given Matt LaFleur some advice about a change to his coaching staff.

BREAKING : Matt LaFleur’s first move after landing massive extension is painfully obvious

The Packers have reportedly signed Matt LaFleur to a multiyear extension, but he must immediately get to work, with one big decision awaiting.

BREAKING : Packers expected to give Matt LaFleur ‘fat new deal’

The Green Bay Packers have been in serious negotiations with head coach Matt LaFleur.

Packers can save almost $60 million in cap space by making these 6 moves

The Packers will need to find ways to create cap space in 2026, but these moves can help them achieve exactly that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *